Showing posts with label sources for model texts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sources for model texts. Show all posts

Sunday, November 10, 2024

Tran Nguyen--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index

I was searching for a good youtube video to to present adverbs of intensity, and I found this youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TranNguyen-hu9bn

As with most of the Youtube channels I stumble cross, I don't know anything about this channel other than what is publicly visible.  The name, Tran Nguyen, seems to indicate that there's a Vietnamese connection.  I'm not sure if the videos are the property of the channel, or are borrowed from other sources.  But either way, there seem to be a lot of good material on here for various grammar points.  I'll list some of them below:


...et cetera.  Check out the channel to see the full video list.  

Monday, November 04, 2024

English Panda--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index:

I was searching for a good youtube video to to present the grammar for wish, and I found this youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@EnglishPandaLessons/videos

This channel has a lot of good videos which put grammar points in context with animated stories.
Check out their grammar playlist HERE

Wednesday, October 09, 2024

oomongzu oomongzu--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index

I was recently searching Youtube for a video that put relative clauses into context, and found this Youtube channel.  https://www.youtube.com/@oomongzu-com

This channel contains a number of videos that put grammar points into context, and then feature explanations at the end.

Linked below are some examples:

...etc.   See more videos at the channel here.  

See also this playlist from the channel: English Grammar Teaching ESL Videos:

Tuesday, October 01, 2024


Index:

I found this Youtube channel when searching for videos on the present perfect.  

This is a bit of an unusual channel to include in my index Youtube Videos to Use as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson, because it's mostly grammar explanations instead of model texts.  However, within the videos, the Youtubers sometimes include little mini dialogues or monologues to illustrate the grammar point, and if you can isolate those bits, you can use these videos as model texts.
The majority of the videos on this channel don't appear to be focused on grammar, but there are a number of grammar videos.  For example:

etc.

Their playlist for English Verb tenses is HERE


...but like I said, this channel is not primarily focused on grammar.  So it would work equally as well (perhaps better even) as a recommendation for Extensive Listening.

Sunday, September 22, 2024

Learn English--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index

I discovered this Youtube channel while searching for videos on Adding Emphasis.  
Like a lot of these ESL Youtube channels, it contains a lot of material, and I suspect the channel is not the legal copyright holder of much of the material that is on it.  
I find the videos using stickfigure animation especially to be very useful as model texts.  (It looks like these videos may have originally been taken from Cambridge in a series called "Grammar on the Move".)  I'll link to some of them below.

... and several more.  You can find more videos by scrolling through the videos on the channel.

Sunday, September 15, 2024


Index

While searching for a good video on imbedded questions, I found this youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@listeninenglish-easyembedd1403

The channel has a lot of good material on it for EFL lessons.  Although, it looks like almost all of this material is from traditionally published sources (e.g. Pearson, American English File), which this channel has re-uploaded, and is claiming fair use of.  (I'll have to leave it to others to discuss whether or not this is actually fair use.  All I'm saying is that these videos exist, if anyone wants to make use of them.)

They are linked to a website, https://listeninenglish.com/, which has a lot of additional listening activities.

Wednesday, August 28, 2024

HamiltonHouseELT--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index

I was searching for a good youtube video to model the difference between the past perfect and the past perfect continuous, and I found this youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@HamiltonHouseELT/videos

It's always a bit difficult to tell, but this looks like this is actually a legitimate Youtube channel by the publisher itself.  (In the past, I've linked to some-channels that may be hosting videos that they don't own, but HamiltonHouseELT looks to be legitimate to me.)

The channel has been around for 13 years now, and if you go through their history, it looks like they've gone through several phases over those years.  At first, they used videos with real actors in them.  These videos are actually pretty well done.  (I used one of these videos in my class, and it worked well.)  

Those videos can be found at these playlists:







...as you get more recent, the channel veers towards more animated videos.  
But between all the videos, quite a lot of material on this channel for making model texts.

Saturday, August 24, 2024

LANGUAGE PLANET TOLUCA--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index

I was recently searching Youtube for a video that put the past continuous into context, and found this Youtube channel.  https://www.youtube.com/@languageplanettoluca/videos
As is often the case on Youtube, it's a bit difficult to tell whether the channel actually owns the videos that it is hosting.  My guess is that in this case, they don't.  (The videos all appear to be from a textbook called Side by Side, which doesn't appear to be affiliated with the channel).
But as is also the case with Youtube videos, it's also a bit difficult to tell whether or not the copyright holders actually care.  Some of these videos were uploaded 12 years ago, so if Side by Side intends to file any take down notices, they are certainly taking their time in doing it.

The videos look to be a little bit dated.  My co-workers and I were debating whether they were from the 1980s or the 1990s.  Certainly, they look to be relics of the days before the Internet, when textbook publishers would have created these kind of videos for VHS tapes, that would have been sold alongside of textbooks.
Inspite of how dated (and cheesy) these videos are, however, they are really good for what they are.  They are clear and easy to understand contexts for grammar points, that can be used as model texts for grammar lessons.  And although they're really cheesy, they're cheesy in a fun way.  They're entertaining.
I'll link to some of them down below:


...et cetera.  I won't link to all the videos, but you can see the full list HERE.  

A quick search of Youtube also reveals that LANGUAGE PLANET TOLUCA is not the only Youtube channel that has uploaded Side by Side videos.  See also this playlist HERE

Saturday, July 20, 2024

editad1--Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

Index
Noun Clause Short Story

Recently I was searching for a Youtube video that presented noun clauses in some sort of context, and I found this channel: https://www.youtube.com/@editad1

It looks like there are a lot of other useful videos on this channel that put grammar points into conversations.  Because they are marked as for kids, Youtube won't let me put them into a playlist, but I'll link to some of them down below.

Friday, October 20, 2023

Made Up Model Texts for Grammar Lessons

(TESOL Materials--Sources for Model Texts)
[I have previously posted my collection of ArticlesFairy TalesJokesMoviesPicture BooksPoemsSongs, and Youtube Videos as sources for model texts.  But if all else fails, and you just can't find a good model text anywhere, you can always just make up your own.  And below is a collection of all the model texts that I've made up over the years.  Now, caveat lector, some of my model texts aren't very good, but I'll list them all first, and then I'll critique them at the bottom of the post.]

Adjectives
Adverbs
2nd Conditional
3rd Conditional
Comparative Adjectives
Going to
Infinitives
Mixed Conditionals
Modals
More, Less, Fewer
Past Forms
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Past Simple versus Present Prefect
Present Continuous for Future Arrangements
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Present Simple
Quantifiers
Questions
Object Pronouns
Reflexive Pronouns
Reflexive Pronoun Ghost Story Lesson--model text (taken from a colleague)
Reported Speech
So and Such
Subject Pronouns

Commentary
I've gone through the trouble of listing all my model texts mostly just to illustrate that it can be easily done.  So remember, if you can't find a good model text anywhere, it's simple enough just to make one up.
That being said, a lot of these are flawed.  The problems with these texts are usually two: firstly, they are not interesting.  Secondly, in a lot of these, I tried to cram in more examples of the grammar point than was natural.
I'll talk bout the first problem first--the fact that these texts are not interesting.  
The best model texts are when the text is an authentic story from the teacher's real-life.
When I was in the teacher training department, I watched an experienced CELTA trainer expertly demonstrate how to use interesting model texts from his own life experience.  All of  his model texts were little short stories about dramatic moments from his own life.  The students would get really involved in the story, and they kept asking him more questions to get more details.  ("What happened next?" "How did you feel?" etc).  In fact, they would be so involved in the context that they would be completely unaware they were in a grammar lesson until he got to the clarification stage.  Which is exactly what he wanted.  Not only did it show the students that the grammar point was part of real-life communication, but it also brought down their resistance to learning grammar.  (If you tell the students at the beginning of class, "today we're going to study grammar", a lot of them will immediately want to tune out.  But if you get them involved in an interesting story, you can keep them engaged for the lesson.)
Now, in his case, he had lived a really interesting life, and he had a lot of interesting anecdotes from his travels.  You or I might not have adventurous lives, but just by virtue of being human, we all have experienced universal human situations--the common drama of life--which are of interest to other humans: a fight with a friend, an embarrassing moment, a time we were scared, a troubled relationship, etc.  The students will be interested in these, because humans are interested in real stories about other people.
By contrast, if the students know that the text is just made up to illustrate a language point, they will be less interested.

When I was on the Delta, I did a lesson on regular past tense pronunciation, in which I used the following manufactured text to put the verbs into context: 
I wanted to make my wife happy, so I decided to make her dinner. I asked her what she wanted
to eat. She answered spaghetti. I hated spaghetti, but I wanted to make her happy.
So I cooked the spaghetti. I planned everything. I started cooking at 4pm. I needed a pot of
water. I waited for the water to get hot, and then I added the spaghetti. I hoped she would like it.
She tasted it, and it she liked it. She was so happy that she kissed me. We enjoyed the dinner
together. She talked about her day, and I listened. We finished dinner at 6pm.
Afterwards, I washed the dishes. My wife helped. Then we walked in the park together. We
looked at the trees. I climbed up one of the trees
Then we returned home. We opened the door and entered the house, and then relaxed on the
sofa. We watched a movie on TV. The movie ended at 10, but we were tired, so we stopped
watching at 9.
When I was getting feedback from the tutor, he said to me: Why would the students have any motivation to listen to your story, when it was neither interesting nor authentic?
Ouch!  But he was absolutely right.

The second flaw in a lot of my model texts is that they confuse quantity of examples with quality.  
I used to think that a good model text must have as many examples of the target grammar point as possible, so I would try to cram in as many examples as I could, even if it made the text sound unnatural.
But you don't actually need the model text to contain 20 examples of the grammar point.  A couple good examples will do the job fine.  In fact, you only really need one clear example that you can illustrate to the students in the clarification stage.
Again, to go back to the experienced CELTA trainer I used to watch: he had a story about how he had taken sleeping pills to help him sleep on a long flight, and then woke up to realize he'd slept so long that he'd slept right through his flight and also missed his connecting flight.  (Again, this was a true story from his life, so the students were really interested.)  The grammar point was the past perfect continuous (had + been +Ving) and the target sentence was "I realized I'd been sleeping for 8 hours."  In this case, he didn't need to put in ten sentences with had+been+Ving.  One clear sentence was enough, and the rest of the story was just providing the context for the grammar point.
And, in fact, it would have been unnatural to put in ten sentences using the past perfect continuous into one story, because the past perfect continuous (like a lot of other verb tenses) is only used to emphasize that this action has a different time perspective than the rest of the actions in the story.  Use it too much, and it quickly becomes unnatural.

[...although, possibly you can justify using a grammar point more than is strictly natural if you're using the technique known as "flooding the input" or sometimes "input flooding", in which you increase the amount of a certain grammar structure in the input in order to get learners to notice it--see here , here , here, etc for more information.]

Note 2
In my staffroom, a lot of my colleagues have started using Chat GPT to create model texts for grammar points.  I've not created a Chat GPT account yet, but apparently you tell it to create a short story using examples of  a certain grammar point, and it can just write that story for you.
Considering Chat GPT is still in its infancy (it only just got released into the world a few short months ago as of this writing), I can only imagine how it will change materials creation in the coming years.  If nothing else, it will certainly save time.
[A lot of the model texts linked to above took me some time to create.  So if Chat GPT can lessen the teacher's workload, so much the better, I guess.  But at the same time, though, I did take pride in the creation of them.  I mean, for all their faults, they were things that served a purpose, that didn't exist before, and that I was responsible for creating using my own creativity.  I got a certain satisfaction from making them. I feel it would be a bit sad if the future was just computers writing everything.  But my feelings on AI are a topic for another day.]
But whatever your thoughts on using AI, remember, if you can use a real life example from your own life, that will always be more interesting for your students than using something auto-created by Chat GPT.

Update November 5, 2025: Google Gemini recently released the storybook feature, which I've found to be useful for creating model text.

Using Fairy Tales to Illustrate Grammar Points


Past Passive
Pronouns
Too and Enough
Wish

Dictogloss

(TESOL Ideas--Activities that can be used for Any Grammar Point, Sources for Model Texts)

Index

I've mentioned dictogloss on this blog a few times before in the past (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, etc), but I've never done a dedicated post on it.  And as I've been recently compiling ideas for model texts, I thought I should include dictogloss in that list, and write up a brief description here.
Dictogloss comes during the presentation stage of a grammar lesson.
The previous time I described dictogloss was in this post here.  At that time, I used this description:

Dictogloss (Materials: a short passage including the grammatical item, that the teacher has prepared ahead of time) (Preparation: create short passage--10 minutes)

Before class, create a short passage that embeds a particular grammatical form you wish to emphasize. 

Read the dictogloss through once at a normal speed, asking students to listen carefully.  (Give them a gist question).  Read the dictogloss a second time, and encourage students to jot down notes.  (Students should write down keywords, but not whole sentences).  Have pairs of students work together for approximately 20-25 minutes to reconstruct the dictogloss, reminding students that they should try to write their text so that it will be as close to the original as possible in grammar and content. Tell  the students that the original sense of each sentence needs to be present and the reconstructed sentences have to be as grammatically accurate as the students can manage, but the words and phrases don’t have to be identical to the ones in the original passage. 

Put the students into larger groups.  (Groups of 4 instead of groups of 2).  Have them compare their answers, and work to consolidate their answers into one final answers.  

Select at least one group and have them write their answer on the board.  Have the class talk about the answer, and as a class, agree on the final answer.  Then, the teacher shows the class the original passage, and the class talks about the differences.

That description was heavily influenced by this PDF here.
I should add, however, that this is simply one way of many of running a dictogloss.
I've seen numerous presentations on dictogloss techniques over the years (at teacher conferences, workshops, training sessions, etc), and I can't help but notice that everyone seems to have their own slightly different method of running a dictogloss.  I've also noticed that certain practitioners tend to be very dogmatic about dictogloss techniques ("it has to be done exactly this way, or it's wrong") while other people are more flexible about how to run it. And so, caveat lector, you will have to use your own judgement on what is the "correct" way to run a dictogloss.
But all dictogloss techniques have the basics in common.  And the basics are these: the teacher creates a short text using the target grammar.  The teacher reads that text to the students.  The students take notes, and then try to reconstruct the text using their notes.  At the end, the teacher shows the original text to the students, and the students compare their versions with the teacher's versions.  The attention is drawn to the target grammar, which the students might or might not have correctly reproduced.
If you follow those basics, you're doing some sort of a dictogloss.
The differences come in in terms of procedure: how many times do the students hear the text?  When are they allowed to take notes?  How big are the groups when the students reconstruct the text? et cetera

In the past, when I've done dictoglosses, I've generally followed this procedure:
1. lead-in to the context of the dictogloss.  (So, for example, when using this dictogloss here, the lead-in was "Talk to your partner.  What did you do this morning?)
2. I give the students a gist question, and read the dictogloss one time.  Students answer the gist question.  
3. Sometimes I have the students listen to the dictogloss a second time and answer specific information questions.  
4. I read the dictogloss again.  Students listen and take notes for keywords.
5. Students work with a partner to reconstruct the text, based on their notes.
6. I recombine students into groups of 4, and they check their answers again.
7. A final version gets written up on the board.  I ask the class if they agree.  Then I show my version.  (If I have a room with a computer projector, I project the dictogloss at this stage.  Otherwise I hand out the paper copy.)
8. Attention is then drawn to the grammar point, and the meaning of the grammar point is checked, either with concept checking questions (see here for an example) or a guided discovery worksheet (see here for an example)

However, recently I was working with an experienced CELTA tutor who emphasized a slightly different procedure.  In his version, it's very important that the students don't write down the key words until after the text is read out. This is because you don't want the students to write down the grammar point in full during the listening.  If you allow students to write down key words during the listening, there is a danger that they might write down the full grammar form when writing down the key words, and, in his view, you don't want that.
The reason is that, in his view, the students learn best when the dictogloss is used to make the students notice the gap between their current abilities and the target form.  So, for example, if the target form in the dictogloss is the past perfect continuous, you actually don't want the students to write down the full verb form (" had been swimming") during the notetaking stage.  You want the students to try to reconstruct the text based on only the key words and the grammar resources that they currently have.  Then, when they compare their version to the teacher's versions, there will be a big "a ha" lightbulb moment when they notice the difference in the grammar.  And this will make the learning more memorable.
For this same reason, he said, you might sometimes ask the students to write down only the base form of the verb (e.g. "swim" instead of "swimming") so that they don't have access to any clues as to the grammar when they are attempting to reconstruct the text themselves.

***********************************************

One last note.
The dictoglosses I've made on the past perfect and the past perfect continuous are not ideal because they are contrived and inauthentic texts made purely to showcase a grammar point.  The best dictoglosses are personal stories.
When I watched the experienced CELTA tutor in action, all of the dictoglosses he used were real stories from his real life.  The students knew that they were real stories.  (Students always seem to know when something is real and when something is contrived.)  And so the students were really interested in the dictoglosses because of this.  Whereas with my dictoglosses, the students were not interested at all.  So, the lesson is: whenever possible, use real personal stories when creating a dictogloss.

Thursday, October 19, 2023


The other day, a teacher at my center got sick, and I was called in to cover a class at the last minute.  Fortunately, the teacher had prepared some materials for me, so I was able to use her lesson plan.
As part of her lesson plan, she had included this video to use as a model text for must, musn't and can.  



The teacher had included no worksheets for the video, and I didn't have time to make up any, so I just used the video without any questions.  But I thought it was a very useful video that I would like to remember in case I ever have the need to go back and do this lesson again in the future.
I was impressed with the production quality of the video, and when I looked at the Youtube channel, I realized there were a lot of similar videos.
Although, if you look at the description in each video, it says: "This video belongs to Go Getter 3 (Pearson)"  Which probably means that (although the Youtuber gets credit for honesty), these videos were probably uploaded without the consent of the copyright holder.  Which means they could get taken down at any moment.  Which means that I should be careful about spending too much time creating supplementary material for these videos.  
However, looking at the upload dates, it looks like they've managed to stay up for 3 years so far without Youtube taking action, so maybe we can hope that they'll last a bit longer?
I'm not familiar with Go Getter 3, but I've googled them just now, and it looks like they're textbooks created for secondary school.  Presumably these videos are supplementary material that comes with the textbook.  Possibly Pearson is not concerned with the videos being leaked on Youtube as long as it is driving interest in the textbook.   Who knows?
Anways, for the time being, these videos are on Youtube, and I think can serve as useful model texts for grammar lessons.  
Once again, I can't put them into a playlist, because Youtube has classified them as "for kids", but here is the list below:

Index

I have previously used one video from this channel before now, but it looks like there are a number of other useful videos on this channel, so I want to index it with my list of youtube videos that can be used as model texts for lessons.

It looks like the channel hasn't been updated for 3 years, so it's probably a dead channel now.  (Looking at the high production quality of the videos versus the low subscriber count, my best guess is the channel author didn't think the slow growth of the channel was worth the effort he was putting into it, and just gave up.  Youtube can be a tough ecosystem to survive in.  But that's just supposition on my part.)
Nonetheless, even though the channel isn't currently being updated, there are a number of videos that could be used for model texts in grammar lessons in the future.  (Because these videos are classified as "content made for kids", I can't put them into a playlist, unfortunately.)

Friday, October 13, 2023

Using Jokes to Illustrate Grammar Points

(TESOL Materials--JokesSources for Model Texts)
[These are some of my jokes that I've repurposed to illustrate grammar points.]

Comparative Adjectives and Adverbs
Reported Speech
The + Nominalized Adjectives

Using Youtube Videos as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

(TESOL Materials--Sources for Model Texts)

Pedagogical Materials











Authentic Materials

Using Movies as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

(TESOL Materials--Movie Worksheets, Sources for Model Texts)

Giving Advice in the Present and Past

[These next materials are based on a different staging than a traditional grammar lesson.  It follows the methodology outlined in  Rules, Patterns and Words by Dave Willis.  According to that methodology, students learn grammar from example sentences from texts that they have previously comprehended for meaning, but not necessarily in the same lesson.  For more on the methodology, see HERE.]

Google drive Folder HERE



Part 1--Past Simple Questions
Part 2--2 Meanings of "must"
Part 3--So
Part 4--2 Meanings of Like
Part 5--Help
Part 6--Still
Part 7--Should
Part 8--Want
Part 9--Different Meanings of Too
Part 10--Relative Clauses with Who
Part 11--Keep
Part 12--Someone, Anyone, Everyone, No one
Part 13--Going To
Part 14--For + Ving
Part 15--"must" and "must have"
* Part 16--Give Word Patterns
Part 17--Try
Part 18--2nd Conditional
Part 19--Both Either Neither
Part 20--Bring

General list
Say or Tell Slideshow
Tell Slideshow
For + Gerund Slideshow
Let Slideshow
Want Slideshow
Going to Slideshow
Still Slideshow
Don't Doesn't Slideshow
Something, Anything, Everything, Nothing Slideshow
Different Meanings of "Can" Slideshow
This/ These Slideshow
2 Meanings of Like: Slideshow
Give Word Patterns Slideshow
So (Adverb) Slideshow
Sentences starting with "what": Questions or exclamations Slideshow
Present Continuous Slideshow
2 Meanings of "must" Slideshow
Adjectives Slideshow
Word Patterns with "stop" Slideshow
Ain't Slideshow
Word Patterns with "Make" Slideshow
Different Meanings of "Old" Slideshow
Different Meanings of  "Too"
Reflexive Pronouns Slideshow
Better vs Had Better
Let vs Let's Slideshow
Past Simple Questions Slideshow
Word Patterns With "Put" Slideshow
So (Conjunction) Slideshow
Relative Clause with Who Slideshow
Should Slideshow
Help Slideshow
Someone, Anyone, Everyone, No one Slideshow
Keep Slideshow
"must" and "must have" slideshow
Try Slideshow
2nd Conditional Slideshow
Both Either Neither Slideshow
Bring Slideshow

Using Picture Books as Model Texts for Grammar Lesson

(TESOL Materials--Story Time, Sources for Model Texts)
[This is an index of Story Time Materials that I've repurposed as Model Texts for Grammar Lessons.]

1st Conditional
Articles
* I often use The Gruffalo to illustrate that the first time something is mentioned, the indefinite article is used (e.g. "a mouse"), but the subsequent times that thing is mentioned, the definite article is used.
Defining and Describing Relative Clauses
Noun Clauses
Prepositions of Movement
Reduced Relative Clauses
* I used The Knight Who Was Afraid of the Dark to introduce Reduced Relative Clauses.  We read through the story together, and then I highlight some sentences like "long ago in a time known as the Dark Ages" and "his faithful electric eel wound round his arm." and "flinging her arms around Sir Fred" (this last one not a reduced relative clause, but a good example of an active participle clause.)
Reported Speech
Sense Verbs + Infinitives