Showing posts with label Marvel Cinematic Universe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marvel Cinematic Universe. Show all posts

Saturday, October 05, 2024

Marvel Comics Index

--The Avengers Vol. 1: The Coming of the Avengers by Stan Lee, Jack Kirby and Don Heck, 


1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3 5 Stars
8. Thor 2: Dark World 4 Stars
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier 4 Stars
10. Guardians of the Galaxy 6 Stars
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron 5 Stars
12. Ant-Man 6 Stars 
13. Captain America 3: Civil War 8 Stars
14. Doctor Strange
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2 8 stars
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming 6 Stars
17. Thor: Ragnarok 8 Stars
18: Black Panther 6 Stars
19. Avengers: Infinity War 9 Stars
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp , 6 Stars
21. Captain Marvel
22. Avengers: Endgame 8 Stars
23. Spider-Man: Far From Home 7 Stars
24. Black Widow--Haven't seen yet
25. Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings--Haven't seen yet
26. Eternals--Haven't seen yet
28. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness--Haven't seen yet
29. Thor: Love and Thunder--Haven't seen yet
30. Black Panther: Wakanda Forever--Haven't seen yet
31. Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania--Haven't seen yet

TV Shows

Playlist HERE:

Wednesday, December 22, 2021

Spider-Man: No Way Home

(Movie Review--Marvel Cinematic Universe)
 

***SPOILERS***

So, we all heard the rumors, right?  Despite Marvel's best efforts at keeping this secret, we all heard that Toby Maguire and Andrew Garfield were seen on the set of this movie.  And that Marvel was doing some sort of multiverse thing.

As a big comic book geek in my youth, I knew that the multiverse has always been a big part of comic book stories.  So in one sense, it seemed totally natural to do.  And, I think if I were 10 years old again, this would be the absolute coolest thing for a movie to do.  (I used to dream of these kind of cross-franchise team ups when I was a kid.)
But now that I'm older, I view these kinds of stunts with a bit more skepticism.  I mean, sure, in one sense, it's really cool.  But in another sense, it seemed a bit...desperate.  Like it seemed like the kind of stunt that fanboys would always dream of, but that a serious franchise would never dream of doing until they were flat out of ideas.  
And yet, here we are.

I don't think a major studio would ever have considered doing a film like this when I was young.  This is the kind of thing that would be viewed as appealing only to the geeks, but not the mainstream audience.  But, as has been noted many times before, somewhere around the turn of the century, geek culture became mainstream, and now a cross-over stunt like this can have major appeal to a mainstream audience.

So, does it work?
The answer is, yeah, mostly.  It's basically like a lot of Marvel movies--by which I mean it's well directed, the actors are all incredibly charismatic and likeable, and it's edited together in a very fast paced way with lots of quick cuts and snappy music.  The movie hums along nicely at a fast pace.  There's plenty of action, plenty of laughs, and the movie cuts so quickly from scene to scene that you really don't have time to get hung up on any one plot point.
There were a lot of things in the movie that I don't think entirely made sense.  And there were some character moments that didn't entirely make sense.  But the movie moves along at such a fast pace that you don't really have time to think about any one thing too much.  You're just along for the ride.

And what a ride it was!  These Spider-Man movies have always done a good job of capturing the kinetic energy of swinging through the air in and out of danger, and this one is no exception.  In fact, this one may be the best one yet.  The action scenes in this movie are really fast paced and intense and brilliant.  And also those scenes with Spider-Man fighting Doctor Strange in the mirror universe were not only wonderfully bizarre, but again had so much kinetic energy throughout (swinging around, riding on speeding trains, etc.)

Once Toby Maguire and Andrew Garfield show up, the pace slows down a little bit.  There's a lot of fan service in this movie.  Which is to be expected.  (I mean, if you're going to do a movie like this, you pretty much have to do the fan service.)  But the problem with fan service is that it slows the story down.  Character moments with Toby Maguire, Andrew Garfield and Tom Holland all bonding are great, but these are also moments in which the story isn't going anywhere.  The movie was on the verge of over-doing these character moments, but I think it gets away with it because it had earned some down-time.  The movie had been so fast paced up until this point that it had earned some slower scenes that don't go anywhere.
(Or... now that I think about, maybe the opposite is true.  Maybe the reason that these character moments felt so slow is because they felt out of place in a movie that had been so fast paced up until these moments.  I don't know, what did you guys think?)

Rating:  
8 out of 10 Stars.  Look, as far as entertaining goes, this film is about as entertaining as you could ask for.  It loses one point for some plot and character moments that don't entirely make sense.  And it loses another point for some fan service that slowed down the plot.  (I'm all for fan service, but you've got to integrate it into the plot better.)  But it's a solid 8 out of 10.

Links

Spider-Man 3 (I guess this is sort of in continuity now)
1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3 5 Stars
8. Thor 2: Dark World 4 Stars
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier 4 Stars
10. Guardians of the Galaxy 6 Stars
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron 5 Stars
12. Ant-Man 6 Stars 
13. Captain America 3: Civil War 8 Stars
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2 8 stars
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming 6 Stars
17. Thor: Ragnarok 8 Stars
18: Black Panther 6 Stars
19. Avengers: Infinity War 9 Stars
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp , 6 Stars
21. Captain Marvel--Haven't seen yet
22. Avengers: Endgame 8 Stars
23. Spider-Man: Far From Home 7 Stars


Monday, March 08, 2021

Wandavision

(TV Show Review)

Started: February 24, 2021 (I actually started dipping my toes into the series the day before, but February 24 is when I admitted to myself that I was actually going to watch the series all the way through.)
Finished: March 4, 2021

Why I Watched This Show
So, I suspect that my experience was similar to everyone else's.  When I first heard about the premise of this show, it didn't sound that interesting to me.  (A sitcom about Wanda and Vision?  Um... maybe I'll just pass this one by and wait for the next big Avengers action movie.)
And then the trailers started coming out and it looked... intriguing.

It looked ambitious, but it also clearly looked like the kind of thing that could either be really good or really bad depending on how it was handled in execution.  Could Marvel pull this off?  It would be interesting to find out either way.
And then once the early episodes started getting released, the reviews on the Internet were all positive.  Apparently Marvel was actually pulling it off.

And yet, for all that, I still planned on giving this series a pass.  I'm super busy these days with the multiple jobs and the kid and everything.  Watching this series wasn't on my list of priorities.

But then, I had the apartment to myself for a week after Tet as my wife and daughter stayed an extra week in her hometown.  That, plus there was another  mini-outbreak of Covid-19 in Ho Chi Minh City (*1), and the city went into semi-lockdown, which meant that I was spending way too much time alone in my apartment and started to get depressed and lonely, and craving distractions.
"Maybe I'll check out that Wandavision thing after all." (*2
I was initially thinking I would just watch one episode to get the flavor of it--you know, just to find out what everyone else was talking about.  And then I watched the second episode just to see where this was going.  And then I watched a couple more episodes the next day and... at that point it was time to admit I had seen enough of the show that I might as well commit to seeing the whole thing through

The Review (*SPOILERS*)  
So, the first thing to note is that the production values on this seem to be really high.  
Take my opinion with a grain of salt, because I don't actually know anything about how movies are made or how much they cost.  But this looks really slick.  It looks like something that could have been released in theatres if it had been a three hours shorter.  (Obviously they saved some money by not having a lot of big action fight scenes, but then the story didn't really require too many fight scenes, so you didn't notice their absence.)

This, combined with the previews for the upcoming Loki and The Falcon and the Winter Soldier seems to mean that Wandavision is evidently the opening salvo in a new direction for the MCU.  It looks like going forward the TV shows will now be cinematic in quality, feature the same actors and characters from the movies, tie-in much more closely with the movies and (presumably) be as influential in advancing the MCU plotlines as the movies are.  
But at the same time, Wandavision and also the trailers for the upcoming  Loki and The Falcon and the Winter Soldier also indicate the streaming TV format seems to be allowing the MCU the freedom to explore some weirder stories that probably would never have gotten approved for the cinema.

This is all quite exciting, and I look forward to seeing how this develops in the next few years.

Also, you've got to give Marvel credit where credit is due.  Obviously several years ago someone at the studio said something like, "Look, these superhero movies we're doing are really popular right now.  We could totally just keep riding this wave until the public gets sick of it.  Or, we could start doing a lot of new and crazy things to constantly keep the public off-guard."
Marvel's track record is so impressive that in retrospect it's easy to forget how weird and strange a lot of these movies seemed before they came out.
The Avengers? You can't possibly make a coherent movie with all these different superheroes at once.
Guardians of the Galaxy?  Nobody is going to be interested in these really obscure strange characters from comic books nobody has ever heard of.
Civil War? You can't possibly make an entertaining movie about superheroes fighting each other for two hours.
Thor: Ragnarok?  Now this is really getting silly, isn't it?
Infinity War?  Splitting the movie into two parts?  That's not going to work.

And yet, they've all worked.  
Mind you, they're not masterpieces.  (Looking at my reviews, I've pretty consistently scored Marvel movies in the 4 to 8 star range.)  But they work.  They're solid enough movies.

And Wandavision works.  It was a gamble, obviously, but it works.
...mostly.  Actually, the premise doesn't really make sense if you think about it too much.
I'm willing to grant that Wanda would use her powers to create an idealized fantasy world, but to imagine that she'd start creating 22 minute TV episodes about her life is pushing it a bit, isn't it?  And then what was her incentive for going in order through the history of television with each subsequent episode?  And why did she create a broadcast signal?  And why was she creating broadcast signals that would only work with televisions of the time?  (How would she even have known what that broadcast signal looked like?)  And what about the commercials?  (And if she was raised on DVDs, as was later revealed, then why is she incorporating era-specific commercials into her broadcasts)?
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
The premise doesn't really make sense from an in-universe character logic standpoint.  But it does make sense in terms of conforming to audience expectations.  In other words, we the audience were pretty explicitly told from the previews that this was going to be some sort of bended reality in which Wanda and Vision were existing in television sitcoms from different eras.  And having gotten onboard with that premise, we then made a sort of tacit agreement with the show's producers that we weren't going to examine the internal logic of this too closely.  We were willing to give the show a lot of space in how it explained what was going on with the television sitcoms.  At least, I was.  And judging by the generally positive reviews this show has gotten, most other people were too.

In the initial episodes, the TV show was firing on multiple cylinders. 
On its basic level, it was trying to get you to enjoy a sitcom about Wanda and Vision and their zany antics. 
But at the same time it was also trying to evoke your nostalgia for old TV reruns by evoking an old aesthetic, and the show was also trying to impress you with how completely they evoked that old 1960s TV aesthetic (complete with ads and everything.) 
But at the same time, it was also trying to get you hooked on the mystery of what was really going on.
But at the same time, it's also an MCU movie.  The show was also trying to remind you about tie-in characters from other MCU movies, and clearly the ground work for future MCU movies (most obviously Captain Marvel 2) is being laid here.  

So the success of each of these endeavors will have to be judged differently.
As someone who grew up on Nick-at-Nite reruns, I thought Wandavision did a decent job of recreating the aesthetic of these older shows.  I initially had it in mind to criticize Wandavision for relying too heavily on specific shows instead of the aesthetic of the respective eras generally.  (The first two episodes were less an homage to 60s TV generally, and more to Bewitched and The Dick Van Dyke Show specifically).   But then in episode 8, we learn that Wanda was in fact influenced only by those specific shows which Wandavision explicitly names.  So, fair enough, I suppose.  

However, try as it might, Wandavision can't quite replicate the charm of those old TV shows.  Bewitched and The Dick Van Dyke Show may be dated, but they were genuinely entertaining.  And The Dick Van Dyke Show especially could be really funny at times.  Wandavision is trying to recreate that experience, but it comes off as just a pale imitation.
Which is why I think the first 3 episodes of Wandavision drag a bit.  There's an initial rush of "Hey! Cool! They're imitating the look of that old TV show!"  But once that wears off (and it wears off quickly) Wandavision doesn't have quite the charm or the humor to carry the rest of the 22 minutes.

Of course, during the first 3 episodes, the audience is also supposed to be interested in trying to figure out what is going on.  But, let's be honest, it was never really that much of a mystery, was it?  Anyone familiar with the Scarlet Witch knows that she has a history of altering reality.  (I wasn't even in the comic book scene when House of M came out in 2005, but it was a big enough event at the time that you couldn't help but hear about it.)  So we all knew that Wanda was altering reality somehow. (*3) 

Which is why I was feeling a bit restless near the end of episode 3, but (just in time) the end of episode 3 is when we break from Wanda's reality, and we start to get in to the real plot of the show.  And so that held my interest.

And of course it was fun to see all those old characters from the MCU.  Randall Park is excellent as Jimmy Woo (from the Ant-Man movies).  He's a very charming actor generally, and has been underutilized in his previous appearances, so it was great to see more of him.
Darcy (from the Thor movies) was never really a fan favorite, but I never hated her either, and it was nice to see at least that the MCU hadn't totally forgotten about her.
I still haven't seen The Captain Marvel movie, so I don't really know the whole story behind Monica Rambeau, but apparently she ties in with Captain Marvel somehow.

The infamous casting of Evan Pieters as Quicksilver (from the X-Men movies) created a whole lot of speculation online about the multiverse and the future of the X-Men in the MCU.  As it was meant to. And that was all part of the misdirection and the fun and the producers were having with the audience.  But it's also dangerous to pull the audience out of the story like that.  Anytime the fans are thinking more about the legal rights of the X-Men characters than they are about the story you are trying to tell, you risk losing the immersion.  
But maybe this is part of storytelling in the Internet age?  The buzz around the story is just as important as the story itself?

The final battle was, as most critics have pointed out, the most boring part of the story.  Partly this was because this was a story in which the audience was more invested in the character arcs than in the fight.  And partly this was because there's not a lot of interesting fight choreography you can do with two witches throwing spells at each other.  

The story ended on a slightly confusing and disappointing note in my opinion.
Wandavision had clearly established that Wanda felt as if the twins were her real children, so I was surprised at how easily she was able to give them up at the end.  (The emotional sacrifice was addressed in a line in the dialogue--"They'll never know how much you sacrificed for them"--but didn't seem to be shown on screen.)
Also, Wanda was somewhat confusingly allowed to walk away from the whole thing without really facing any consequences, or even appearing to come to terms with what she had done.  The framing of the episode even suggested we the viewer were supposed to sympathize with Wanda more than the townspeople.  This seemed like the show had dropped the ball on the moral ambiguity it had been building up so far.
Also, what happened with White Vision at the end?  He had his memories restored, right?  So you'd think he would want to return to Wanda at that point, but instead he just vanishes.
And how did Monica Rambeau get those powers?  Something about passing through the hex, I guess.  But why wasn't she more surprised when those bullets passed through her.
And what about...

...actually enough with the plot holes and nitpicks (*4 (We're going to be here all day if I get into every little nitpick.  Plus, this being 2021, every plot point that could be nitpicked has already been written about by someone on the Internet.)

I'll just close with one last observation:
I'm a bit worried about how powerful Wanda is.  It appears she now has near infinite and godlike powers, right?  And I know this is a problem inherited from the comic books (The Scarlet Witch in the comic books was also way too powerful), but it's going to be hard to take any future stories in the MCU seriously from now on, right?  You can't have real stakes anymore.  Any future threat, and you could just say, "Well, why doesn't the Scarlet Witch just take care of this with her infinite amount of reality bending magical powers?"
...unless (and there are hints of this in the final scene)...unless the Scarlet Witch's next appearance is not as one of the Avengers, but as one of the antagonists.  That could potentially be interesting.
I'll guess we'll have to wait and see what they do with it.

Marvel Cinematic Universe Links
1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3 5 Stars
8. Thor 2: Dark World 4 Stars
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier 4 Stars
10. Guardians of the Galaxy 6 Stars
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron 5 Stars
12. Ant-Man 6 Stars 
13. Captain America 3: Civil War 8 Stars
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2 8 stars
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming 6 Stars
17. Thor: Ragnarok 8 Stars
18: Black Panther 6 Stars
19. Avengers: Infinity War 9 Stars
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp , 6 Stars
21. Captain Marvel--Haven't seen yet
22. Avengers: Endgame 8 Stars
23. Spider-Man: Far From Home 7 Stars

Footnotes (docs, pub)
(*1) The outbreak now appears to be under control, so no need to worry about me.

(*2) To answer the obvious question--I don't think Disney Plus is currently available in Vietnam.  But copyright isn't strictly enforced in Vietnam, so there are a number of streaming websites in Vietnam which host all the latest releases.  (I'm not proud.)

(*3) But at least the details were still mysteries.  (What had happened with Vision's body?  Was Vision really back from the dead now?  Who was that voice on the radio?  Etc.)

(*4) There is also, of course, the infamous ever-green nitpick that you can ask about any solo MCU project: Where were the rest of the Avengers?  
It's a problem that's inherited from the world of comic books.  There are team-up comic books, but there are also solo comic book.  And if you're reading a solo comic books, it's no good constantly asking, "But where are the rest of the superheroes?"  Having been a comic book geek in my youth, I learned to forgive this a long time ago.  When Batman is fighting Bane (for example), it's no fair asking, "But where is Superman?"  I mean, you could, but why would you?  If you're going to nitpick that, you might as well just stop reading.  You just have to assume that on Batman's solo adventures, Superman and all the rest of the other superheroes are busy somewhere fighting some other existential threat.
The same thing applies to the MCU.

Video Review
Video review HERE and embedded below.

Apologies about how terrible the video review is.  I filmed this late at night on a day when I was tired from working and sleep deprived.  Lately the only time when I can film videos is after the toddler has gone to bed, and filming late at night after a day of work does not bring out my best.  I would have waited until the next day except I knew the circumstances would be exactly the same on the next day.
My general philosophy with the Youtube videos (and with this blog as well) is to just throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.  In other words, some of these videos turn out good, some of them turn out bad, but if I keep at it and keep making videos, eventually some of them are going to turn out good.
Who knows, in 10 years maybe I'll be in a position where I can start getting enough sleep and making better videos.
Also, yet  another video in which I ramble on for too long, and get cut-off when my camera automatically shuts off after 30 minutes.


Monday, July 08, 2019

Spider-Man: Far From Home

(Movie Review)

The Review
A fun little Superhero movie, but nothing particularly groundbreaking like Endgame.

I suppose it's unfair to compare this movie to Avengers: Endgame.  Not every movie can or should be a huge event movie like Endgame.  You need the ordinary superhero movies in between so that the big event movies can feel special.  But... I can't help but think it, this movie does feel a bit anti-climatic after Endgame.

...anyway,
A good Spider-Man movie needs to focus on Peter Parker's high school angst, and Peter Parker's group of teenage friends.
A Marvel Cinematic Universe movie needs to make connections to the larger world of superheros and reference the big events that happened in previous movies.
This movie does as good a job of balancing the two as can be hoped for.  The decision to send Peter Parker's high school friends on a European field trip allowed the writers to take the story to exotic locations, while still keeping the focus on the group of friends.

The movie is lighthearted and fun.  With a lot of jokes thrown in.
If I was inclined to be critical, I could complain that the movie is not quite as funny as it thinks it is.  (Quite often I thought that a corny joke didn't quite merit all the set-up that the movie gave it).  But why complain about nitpicks? These Marvel Cinematic Universe movies have always done a fairly good job of managing the tone-- keeping their movies fun, but also keeping the stakes real.  (After the complete failure of the DC Cinematic Universe to manage the same act, it's a reminder that we've gotten spoiled by how good the Marvel movies are.)

Other Notes
* I was a little concerned at first that Marvel was throwing away the dramatic weight behind their own storyline by treating the "blip" as just a joke.  But after thinking about it, I think it works.  The opening scenes were just showing how high school students would react to the blip.  Of course from a high school student's perspective, the injustice of having to retake mid-terms would be the most important thing about the blip.
This doesn't preclude a later movie from taking a more serious look at the massive societal disruption the blip must have caused.

Rating:
7 out of 10 Stars.  (Good fun film, but just as easily forgettable).

Marvel Cinematic Universe Reviews Links

1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3
8. Thor 2: Dark World
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier
10. Guardians of the Galaxy
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron
12. Ant-Man
13. Captain America 3: Civil War
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming
17. Thor: Ragnarok
18: Black Panther
19. Avengers: Infinity War
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp ,
21. Captain Marvel--Haven't seen yet
22. Avengers: Endgame

Video Review:
Video review HERE and embedded below:



Link of the Day
Noam Chomsky - The Relevance of Anarcho-syndicalism (1976)

Monday, May 13, 2019

Avengers: Endgame

(Movie Review)


***SPOILERS***
I'm 2 weeks late on this because it's a lot harder to make it to the cinema after having a baby.  But the wife's sister agreed to watch the baby for one afternoon so we could watch this.

I do genuinely enjoy these movies, but they've also begun to feel a bit like an obligation.  It feels like you absolutely HAVE to make a trip to the theater to see this, or you're missing out on an important cultural milestone.
I do also wonder at what age I'm going to become too old for dumb superhero movies.  I mean, here I am, 41 years old, and still planning my day around seeing a superhero movie.  Should I have stopped watching these 10 years ago, or has the culture shifted so that these are now acceptable for adults?
At any rate, after some 20 movies watched, I feel like it's too late to back out now.  At this point I have to watch this one to see how it all ties together. 

Actually to give credit where credit is due, whatever else you want to say about these movies, they are not "dumb superhero" movies.  The plotting and continuity off these movies has become complex enough that at this point, I have to admit the people making these movies are a lot smarter than I am.  They're juggling a lot of characters, and a lot of story-arcs here, but they manage to do justice to them all.  And they throw in a some interesting plot twists and subverted expectations.

We've also reached a point where the convoluted continuity of comic book characters (which used to be something only geeks cared about), has now become mainstream.  Pity the poor person who tries to watch this movie without a detailed understanding of the previous 20 movies before it.  This movie is chalked full of Easter eggs and references to previous movies.  (My sister-in-law got dragged to this movie by her boyfriend, and didn't understand anything that was going on.)
Me? I've always been a geek, so I eat this kind of stuff up.  I loved all the call-backs, references, and continuity nods to previous movies.

There were a few plot twists in this movie that I thought were very clever and some of which took me off guard.  Kudos to the writers--there's some really clever plotting and set-up and pay-off things going on here--which is difficult considering how many characters they're juggling.

I also really enjoyed the humor in this movie.   (I thought that whole fat Thor thing was the funniest thing ever.)
The action scenes were decent--I liked the battle between Thanos and Thor/Captain America/ Iron Man.
The big battle at the end was well-done also.  Although this is (by my count) the 4th Avengers movie that has ended with a big battle against an invading horde.  I guess if you're going to bring all the Avengers together into one movie, then you need to have something big for them to fight.  But too much of this could get tiring quickly.  (I'm happy to wait a few years before the next movie that has the Avengers battling a huge space army).

Rating:
8 out of 10 Stars.

Marvel Cinematic Universe Reviews Links

1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3
8. Thor 2: Dark World
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier
10. Guardians of the Galaxy
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron
12. Ant-Man
13. Captain America 3: Civil War
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming
17. Thor: Ragnarok
18: Black Panther
19. Avengers: Infinity War
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp ,
21. Captain Marvel--Haven't seen yet

Video Review HERE and embedded below


Link of the Day

Thursday, October 18, 2018

Avengers Age of Ultron--Movie Worksheets

(Movie Worksheets)

Google Drive Folder HERE
Worksheets:
Part 1 (docs, pub), Part 2 (docs, pub), Part 3 (docs, pub), Part 4 (docs, pub), Part 5 (docs, pub), Part 6 (docs, pub), Part 7 (docs, pub), Part 8 (docs, pub), Part 9 (docs, pub), Part 10 (docs, pub), Part 11 (docs, pub), Part 12 (docs, pub), Part 13 (docs, pub), Part 14 (docs, pub), Part 15 (docs, pub), Part 16 (docs, pub), Part 17 (docs, pub), Part 18 (docs, pub)

Edited versions (bad words and sexual innuendos removed):
Edited part 16 (docs, pub), Edited Part 17 (docs, pub)

Quizlet Folder: HERE:
Avengers Age of Ultron 1, Avengers Age of Ultron 2, Avengers Age of Ultron 3, Avengers Age of Ultron 4, Avengers Age of Ultron 5, Avengers Age of Ultron 6, Avengers Age of Ultron 7,

Procedure
Each worksheet is actually several worksheets.  They are doublesided (so that pages 1&2 are actually front and back of the same sheet, etc).

Pre-listening Task
Hand out the first worksheet, which is the dialogue of the movie in scrambled sentences.  Students are placed into teams (one worksheet per team) and a timer is put up on the board.  Students have 5 minutes to unscramble all of the sentences.
Afterwards, the teacher checks the answers (but without letting students see the answers).  Teacher gives students points for each correct sentence, but does not tell the students which sentences are correct and which ones aren't.  All the points are put on the scoreboard, and the team that has the most sentences correct is the winner for that round.

Roud 2: Listening
The teacher plays the movie.  The movie is played twice.  The first time, with the lights off.  (The students just listen and watch.)  The second time, the movie is played with the lights on.  The students fix their worksheets as they listen.
The teacher checks the answers.  This time the students can see the correct answers, and the teacher leaves a copy of the answer sheet with each time, so that they can study the answers.
Correct answers for each team are tallied, and put on the scoreboard, and one team is the winner.

Round 3: Post-listening
Students are given 2 minutes to memorize as much of the dialogue as they can.  Then all the sheets are collect back to the teacher.  The teacher gives out a new sheet, with the movie dialogue written in the students' L1 (in this case, Vietnamese).  The students have 5 minutes to translate the dialogue back to the original English in their teams.
At the end of 5 minutes, the teacher plays the movie one last time.  The students have one last opportunity to listen and check their answers.  Then the teacher goes around and checks the answers.  The team with the most correct answers is the winner.

Homework:
The final pages of the worksheet (9&10) are homework.  There is a link to the quizlet, which (for the first 7 worksheets at least) reviews all the dialogue studied so far.  There is also the transcript for tomorrow's part of the movie, which the students can begin memorizing at home.

Methodology/Justification
So, I'm a huge fan of using movies in the classroom.  (See: Showing Movies in the ClassroomComprehensible Input in Young Learner Classes, and Input Workshop: Upgrading Your Input)

The last movie worksheet I did, Atlantis, I was worried that student engagement was beginning to drop off.  So I wanted to think of a way to force more student engagement.
I had just got done reading A Framework for Task-Based Learning by Jane Willis, and I was thinking about how I could turn these movie worksheets into more of a task.
I also have a highly competitive class (this is a group of children ages around 9-11), so I tried to utilize that by making every stage of this a competitive game.
For my class, this worked beautifully.  It gave the students a huge incentive to work hard in class, and also many of them actually started studying at home--just so they could beat the other teams.  (I also started giving out prizes to winning teams.)
I had mixed feelings about using the students' L1 (Vietnamese) because it would limit the generalizability of these worksheets, and I've been using this blog to share my worksheets with English teachers around the world.  But the idea of having a final stage where the students had to look at the L1 translation seemed to me so useful for my own students that I couldn't resist.
For people outside of Vietnam who want to use these worksheets, you could either omit the last step.  Or you could create worksheets in your own students' L1.  Or you could create an alternative final task--maybe one where every other line of dialogue is omitted, and the students have to re-create it from memory.

Because these tasks involve going over the dialogue in such detail, we only averaged about 1-2 minutes of movie time each lesson.  I knew from the beginning we were never going to finish the movie.  I just kept doing it until the students got sick of it.  (Movie worksheets are optional in my class.  The students always have an option of voting to stop them.)  After 18 parts, they decided to vote to stop it.

The quizlet quizzes only got to part 7.  There were a neat idea, but I wasn't sure any students were actually doing them, and they were time consuming to make, and when I started getting crazy busy with other stuff, this was the easiest thing to cut out.  (If I ever re-use these movie worksheets, I might give the quizlet quizzes another go.)

Other Links
I reviewed Age of Ultron on this blog last year.  I gave it a lukewarm review.
This movie wouldn't have been my first choice, but at this point, I'm running out of movies to do with this class.  (I've had this class for 3.5 years now, and have worked through all of my favorite old movies).
The class really wanted to do this movie.  (Despite my own opinions, they think this is the best Avengers movie.)  This admittedly violates my Why the Students Should Never Pick the Movie rule, but I decided you have to make compromises every once and a while.

* With the previous movie, Atlantis, I put any vocabulary questions up on slideshows, and we reviewed them the next class.  We experimented a little with doing that with this movie, but the general consensus of the students was that, because I was giving them the Vietnamese translation of everything, they had very few vocabulary questions.  So we stopped doing it after just one.
But for what it is worth, here is our vocabulary slideshows for part 2.
Part 2: slides, pub.  (I created a blank template for part 3 with the intention of filling it out in class, but we never used it: slides, pub

Wednesday, August 08, 2018

Thor: The Dark World

(Movie Review)

Why I Saw This Movie
This movie came out 5 years ago, so obviously I'm a bit late on this one.
Back in 2013, I wasn't entirely committed to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  I would see the movies if they were convenient, but I would just as happily not see them.
Lately, though, I've been getting more and more sucked in.  (The Marvel movies have really been getting better and better lately.  All of the recent Marvel movies from the past couple years have been really good: Civil War, Guardians of the Galaxy 2, Spider-Man, Ragnarok, Black Panther, and Infinity War--all excellent.)

So, the more I get sucked into these newer movies, the more I want to go back and catch the ones I've missed so I can pick up on the continuity notes.  (Several of the Marvel movies since have referenced events in Thor: The Dark World.  For example Ragnarok, and Infinity War.)
I've been wanting to see this movie for the past couple years now, but kept waiting for it to be on T.V.  (I know in this day and age you can find everything off of the Internet, but I hate watching action movies on my small computer screen.  I preferred to watch it in style on the big television screen.)
For the past couple years I had bad luck.  I would always turn the TV on right in the middle of this movie, or right when it was ending.  But then, this morning, I was flipping channels, and I caught this movie right at the beginning.  So I watched it, and here I am with my review.

The Positives
* The coolest thing about these Thor movies is how they blend Norse mythology with comic books.  The 9 Realms.  The Rainbow Bridge.  Vanaheimr.  The Dark Elves.  When I'm watching these Thor movies, I keep thinking: "What kind of whacked out comic book writing is this?" Only to go to Wikipedia, and discover that most of this comes directly from the original Norse Mythology. 
I'm given to understand this was how Jack Kirby wrote the original comics way back in the 1960s, although--comic book geek though I am--I'm not well read in my Thor.
(I also mentioned this in my review of Ragnarok.)

* The interaction between Thor and Loki was good.

* In retrospect, you can see that even back in 2013 they were setting up a lot of the pieces for Infinity War.  It's kind of cool how intricately they had this all planned out.

Negatives
* Asgard was really visually appealing, but the dark world was really boring visually.

* The villains were really boring.

* I really liked Thor's three Warrior friends from the first movie.  They were played by delightfully quirky character-actors.  Plus I liked the idea of Thor having friends and teammates on Asgard, instead of just being a weird loner.
The good news is that they brought them all back for this sequel, but the bad news is that they were barely used.  (And what's worse is that they got killed of in Ragnarok, after again being barely used.  So... so much for those characters, I guess.)

* Natalie Portman wasn't really interesting in this movie.

The Review
You know, we had had so many really great Marvel movies lately, that I kind of forgot there was a period during phase 1 and phase 2 where a lot of these movies were pretty much just place-holders between the big event team-up movies.  But yeah, let's face it, some of these phase 2 movies were pretty forgettable.
This movie isn't bad.  It's competently done, and has a couple decent action scenes.
But it's not great either.  It's pretty meh.  The craziness of Asgard is under-utilized, and the new Dark World is just really boring.

Rating ;
4 out of 10 Stars.  (Maybe border-line 5 stars.)

Marvel Cinematic Universe Links:
1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3
8. Thor 2: Dark World
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier
10. Guardians of the Galaxy
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron
12. Ant-Man
13. Captain America 3: Civil War
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming
17. Thor: Ragnarok
18. Black Panther
19. Avengers: Infinity War
20. Ant-Man and the Wasp

Video Review
Video review HERE and embedded below:



Link of the Day
Noam Chomsky on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “Spectacular” Victory & Growing Split in Democratic Party

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Ant-Man and the Wasp

(Movie Review)

Why I Saw This Movie
After being wowed by Infinity War, I've officially given in. I'm a fan of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and I want to see all the movies.

Positives
* A good fun movie

* Walton Goggins

* About halfway through the movie, I realized that the stakes in this movie were going to be a lot less than in other Marvel movies.  There wasn't really a villain.  (Ghost didn't actually want to harm anyone). "How are they going to make an exciting climax out of this?" I thought.
But... they still managed to make a really fun exciting climax after all.

Mixed
The fun of the Ant-Man movies is supposed to be the humor.  And although this movie was funny, it wasn't hilarious.  There were quite a few jokes that didn't land, and a few more that the movie built up too much. Too much emphasis (music cues, reaction shots) for a mediocre joke.  It wasn't terrible.  There were some good laughs.  Paul Rudd, Michael Pena, and Walter Goggins are all good.  But it wasn't spectacular.  (This may be a result of these Marvel movies being cranked out too fast.  Action scenes are the easy part.  But it takes a lot of time and talent to make a funny movie.)

Review
Nothing spectacular, but a good fun movie.  Some great chase scenes.  Some good action scenes.  Decently funny (even if it is not absolutely hilarious).

Rating :
6 out of 10 Stars.  (Good fun movie.  Nothing spectacular)

Marvel Cinematic Universe Links:
1. Iron Man
2. The Incredible Hulk
3. Iron Man 2
4. Thor
5. Captain America: The First Avenger
6. The Avengers
7. Iron Man 3
8. Thor 2: Dark World--Haven't seen yet
9. Captain America 2: Winter Soldier
10. Guardians of the Galaxy
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron
12. Ant-Man
13. Captain America 3: Civil War
14. Doctor Strange--Haven't seen yet
15. Guardians of the Galaxy 2
16. Spider-Man: Homecoming
17. Thor: Ragnarok
18. Black Panther
19. Avengers: Infinity War

Video Review
Video Review HERE and embedded below:



Link of the Day
"Chomsky on Evolution", Stony Brook Interview #3 with Richard Larson

Friday, April 27, 2018

Avengers: Infinity War

(Movie Review)

****SPOILERS****

Positives
* Wow, these Marvel movies, huh?  Every time they keep upping the ante.  And every time I keep thinking they can't possibly pull it off.  And yet they keep pulling it off.

* Related to the above point:
When I first heard that Marvel was doing a movie about all the heroes fighting Thanos, I thought, "Well, okay, but you can't possibly build an interesting story around that."
And then they went ahead and built an interesting story around it.
Not only that, but it's clear now that they've been setting up a lot of the pieces for this movie over their last several movies, in order to get all the characters to exactly the spots they needed to be for this movie to work.
It's quite clever really.
Often when I get out of a Hollywood movie, I think to myself, "Well, geez, I could have written that."
In this case, looking at all the clever set-ups and pay-offs that have cumulated in this movie, I'm thinking to myself, "I definitely couldn't have written this."

* The movie is almost all fight scenes, but to give credit where credit is due, the fight scenes are really awesome.

* Lots of fun seeing all these characters from different movies meet each other for the first time, and finally interact.

* Lots of humor.

Negatives
* So, I was a big comic book geek in my youth.  
And as a comic book geek, one problem that I often noticed is that the more bizarrely powerful the heroes got, the more bizarrely powerful the villains had to get in order to make it interesting.
Particularly with team-up comics (like Teen Titans or Justice League) the combined power of the heroes is so powerful that they usually have to invent some sort of god-like villain in order to create any kind of stakes.
But the problem with an omnipotent villain is that :
1) the story quickly becomes pretty ridiculous, and 
2) it creates all sorts of plot holes--mostly along the lines of "Well if he had the power to do that in one scene, why didn't he have the power to do it again in another scene."
Thanos is a classic example of this problem.  A practically omnipotent villain, who acquires the power to alter reality, and travel through time.  
I'm pretty sure that if you went through and analyzed this story carefully, it would be full of plot holes.  Thanos's powers did not seem consistent from one scene to the next.

Mixed Bag
 * So, no Hawkeye or Ant-Man in this movie, huh?  Given all the other superheroes this movie was juggling, I hardly missed them.  But still, I wonder why they didn't work in some sort of brief cameo for them?  What do you suppose was the behind the scenes reason?

* So, we all know Spider-Man and Black Panther aren't really dead.  Of course they're not dead, we all know that more Spider-Man and Black Panther movies are in production.  So they can't be dead.
So that attempt to make us think they were dead is really kind of pathetic, isn't it?
I was tempted to put this in the negative column, but then eventually I decided that this wasn't really Marvel's fault.  They can't really do anything about the fact that the big budget Hollywood movie machine is too much of a behemoth to keep anything secret.
It's a losing game trying to build tension about characters who we know have more franchise films coming out, but I guess I don't blame them for trying.

* Since this film ended on a cliff-hanger, full judgement on the success of this story will have to wait until part 2 comes out next year.
Obviously we know most of the superheros will be resurrected somehow (see the above point).  But how?  Will it be in a cheap cop-out way, or will it be in a way that feels authentic to the story?
And how far reaching will this resurrection be?  Will characters that were killed earlier in the movie (like Loki or Gamora) also be resurrected?
Since it was already established in this movie that the infinity stones control the movement through time, I'm a bit worried the resolution will involve some sort of going back in time.
Generally I really hate the idea of going back in time to resolve plot points.  (Exceptions can be made for movies where the whole premise is about going back in time to fix something--like Back to the Future.  Then it's fair enough, because that's the premise. But if going back in time is just an addendum at the end of the movie, then I don't like it.)
But we'll have to wait and see I guess.

Rating :
9 out of 10 Stars--Quite possibly the best super hero movie ever.  Certainly the most ambitious super hero movie ever.  Close to 10 out of 10 stars, but it loses one star for 2 reasons--the godlike villain problem, and the cliffhanger ending.